Pular para o conteúdo principal

Featured

Community Detection and Modularity

In the context of community detection in complex networks, which of the following statements most accurately describes the "resolution limit" inherent in modularity (Q) optimization? Answer Options: A. The resolution limit refers to the inability of the Girvan-Newman algorithm to efficiently recalculate edge betweenness in large-scale networks, thus preventing its practical application. B. The resolution limit refers exclusively to divisive methods, indicating that iterative edge removal always fragments the network into individual components before a maximum of modularity can be achieved. C. The resolution limit is an artifact of the configuration model used in the modularity formula, causing the method to fail to detect small communities, even if they are strongly internally connected (such as cliques), favoring their merging into larger communities to maximize the overall Q. D. The resolution limitation states that modularity (Q) will always assign a negative value to any ...

Discovering Linguistic Echoes: The Power of Strongly Connected Components


Imagine a directed network where each node represents a language and each edge indicates that one language has directly influenced the evolution of another (e.g., from Latin to French, from Arabic to Spanish, or from Sanskrit to Hindi). The goal is to identify sets of languages ​​that influence each other directly or indirectly, i.e., strongly connected components (SCCs).

To solve this problem, Kosaraju's algorithm is applied, which includes three steps:

  1. Obtain the decreasing order of completion times of a DFS.
  2. Traverse the inverse graph in that order.
  3. Determine the resulting SCCs.
On this basis, he answers:

When running Kosaraju's algorithm on the described network of linguistic influences, why is it crucial to order the nodes by decreasing completion times in the first DFS traversal before processing the reverse graph?

Answer options:

A) Because it ensures that, when exploring the reverse graph, each traversal starts from a language that condenses the greatest scope of influences in the original network.

B) Because it prevents explorations of the reverse graph from fragmenting the same strongly connected component into artificial subsets.

C) Because it ensures that the traversal of the reverse graph fully captures the languages ​​in the same reciprocal influence group before moving on to another group.

D) Because without this ordering, the algorithm could confuse unidirectional influences (such as from Latin to Spanish) with bidirectional relationships, impairing the correct detection of strongly connected components.

E) None of the above.

Original idea by: Juan Jose Rodriguez Rodriguez. 

Comentários

  1. Questão interessante, mas confesso que achei um pouco subjectiva. Usa termos como "greatest scope of influence" , "fragmenting ... into artificial subsets", etc. Ey acho que é a (C), mas tenho medo de colocar esta questão e haver muitos questionamentos e argumentos se alguém escolher outra alternativa.

    ResponderExcluir

Postar um comentário